Summer Shade Bypass

It is our pledge that we will provide a free case review for any individual or business facing eminent domain or condemnation.

Project Details

This project includes construction of a new bypass from KY 90 around Summer Shade and the widening of KY 90 from the Metcalfe/Barren County line to the beginning of the proposed bypass. The bypass will have 11-foot driving lanes and 8-foot shoulders.

Summer Shade Bypass

If you are affected by the Summer Shade Bypass you need to protect your legal rights.  Sever Storey is focused on maximizing compensation for landowners faced with eminent domain. For a complimentary review of your case call us now at 888-318-3761 or email me directly at George@landownerattorneys.com

Case Results

State: Indiana (Marion County)

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $46,160

Sever Storey Walker Result:

$2,400,000

State: Indiana (Johnson County)

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $301,200

Sever Storey Walker Result:

$3,800,000

State: Indiana (Vigo County)

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $1,186,000

Sever Storey Walker Result:

$4,475,000

State: Indiana (Hamilton County)

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $79,200

Sever Storey Walker Result:

$3,000,000

State: Georgia (Union County)

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $454,250

Sever Storey Walker Result:

$1,500,000

State: Illinois, Sangamon County

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $125,600

Sever Storey Walker Result:

$1,191,950

Meet Our Team

Sever Storey Walker Team

At Sever Storey Walker, we pride ourselves on the expertise and dedication of our team. Get to know the faces behind the firm and discover the depth of knowledge and commitment that drives us to achieve the best possible outcomes for you.

Contact Us

Before going alone against the State let us give you our opinion. It is our pledge that we will provide a free case review for any individual or business facing eminent domain or condemnation. Contact us now at 888-318-3761

* Disclaimer: Form submission doesn’t constitute a client-attorney relationship/contract.