Project Overview
Project Details
The Missouri Department of Transportation will enhance Route K in Reynolds and Iron Counties, from 2.5 miles east of Route 21 near Ellington to 1.3 miles west of Route 49 near Annapolis. The project involves improving nine curves, including widening one, adding edgeline rumble stripes to eight curves, and installing a guardrail at one curve. Right-of-way acquisition is needed only for the curve widening.
Route K is reduced to one lane with a 14-foot width restriction. Flaggers will guide motorists through the work zone as new pavement is integrated with the existing road.
Case Results
State: Indiana (Marion County)
Case Type: Road projects
Initial Offer: $46,160
Sever Walker Padgitt Result:
$2,400,000
State: Indiana (Johnson County)
Case Type: Road projects
Initial Offer: $301,200
Sever Walker Padgitt Result:
$3,800,000
State: Indiana (Vigo County)
Case Type: Road projects
Initial Offer: $1,186,000
Sever Walker Padgitt Result:
$4,475,000
State: Indiana (Hamilton County)
Case Type: Road projects
Initial Offer: $79,200
Sever Walker Padgitt Result:
$3,000,000
State: Georgia (Union County)
Case Type: Road projects
Initial Offer: $454,250
Sever Walker Padgitt Result:
$1,500,000
State: Illinois, Sangamon County
Case Type: Road projects
Initial Offer: $125,600
Sever Walker Padgitt Result:
$1,191,950
Meet Our Team
At Sever Walker Padgitt, we take pride in our expertise and dedication. With over 50 years of combined experience, our entire firm is built around serving you—the landowner who is facing eminent domain or condemnation.
Get to know the faces behind the firm and discover the depth of knowledge and commitment that drives us to achieve the best possible outcomes for you.
Contact Us
Let us share our expertise before you take on Connecticut by yourself. We pledge to provide a free case review for any individual or business facing eminent domain or condemnation.
Contact us online or call 888-318-3761 to speak to a Connecticut eminent domain attorney.
* Disclaimer: Form submission doesn’t constitute a client-attorney relationship/contract.