Il 176/60-83 Project

It is our pledge that we will provide a free case review for any individual or business facing eminent domain or condemnation.

Project Details

This project just received federal approval in August of 2012. The project study limits extend from IL Route 176, at the north, to the intersection of IL Route 60 (Townline Road) and IL Route 83. The planned improvements address roadway and operational deficiencies, traffic safety, traffic congestion, and delays. The Village of Mundelein is the lead agency on the project.

Case Results

State: Indiana (Marion County)

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $46,160

Sever Walker Padgitt Result:

$2,400,000

State: Indiana (Johnson County)

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $301,200

Sever Walker Padgitt Result:

$3,800,000

State: Indiana (Vigo County)

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $1,186,000

Sever Walker Padgitt Result:

$4,475,000

State: Indiana (Hamilton County)

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $79,200

Sever Walker Padgitt Result:

$3,000,000

State: Georgia (Union County)

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $454,250

Sever Walker Padgitt Result:

$1,500,000

State: Illinois, Sangamon County

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $125,600

Sever Walker Padgitt Result:

$1,191,950

Our Team

Sever Walker Padgitt Team Photo

At Sever Walker Padgitt, we pride ourselves on our team’s expertise and dedication. Get to know the faces behind the firm and discover the depth of knowledge and commitment that drives us to achieve the best possible outcomes for you.

Contact Us

Before you go up against Illinois alone, let us give you our opinion. We pledge to provide a free case review for any individual or business facing eminent domain or condemnation. Contact us now at 888-318-3761.

Max. file size: 50 MB.
While Sever Walker Padgitt takes measures to keep our website secure, the uploading of any attachments is not a secure upload. Please do not upload sensitive documents using this form.

* Disclaimer: Form submission doesn’t constitute a client-attorney relationship/contract.