Broadway Ave Bridge Replacement (OH)

It is our pledge that we will provide a free case review for any individual or business facing eminent domain or condemnation.

Project Overview

  • Location of Project: Ohio

  • Type of Project: Road

  • Timeline: 2024-2025

Project Details

Replace the State Route 14 (Broadway Ave.) Whitehouse Crossing bridge over the N&S Railroad in Garfield Heights. The project aims to enhance safety and traffic flow.

Traffic will be maintained during construction along SR 14 by working on one side of the bridge at a time, keeping at least one lane open in each direction. Henry Street will be closed near SR 14 for the duration of the project, with a detour via McCracken Road to SR 14.

Case Results

State: Indiana (Marion County)

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $46,160

Sever Walker Padgitt Result:

$2,400,000

State: Indiana (Johnson County)

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $301,200

Sever Walker Padgitt Result:

$3,800,000

State: Indiana (Vigo County)

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $1,186,000

Sever Walker Padgitt Result:

$4,475,000

State: Indiana (Hamilton County)

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $79,200

Sever Walker Padgitt Result:

$3,000,000

State: Georgia (Union County)

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $454,250

Sever Walker Padgitt Result:

$1,500,000

State: Illinois, Sangamon County

Case Type: Road projects

Initial Offer: $125,600

Sever Walker Padgitt Result:

$1,191,950

Meet Our Team

Sever Walker Padgitt Team Photo

At Sever Walker Padgitt, we pride ourselves on the expertise and dedication of our team. Get to know the faces behind the firm and discover the depth of knowledge and commitment that drives us to achieve the best possible outcomes for you.

Contact Us

Before going alone against the State let us give you our opinion. It is our pledge that we will provide a free case review for any individual or business facing eminent domain or condemnation. Contact us now at 888-318-3761

* Disclaimer: Form submission doesn’t constitute a client-attorney relationship/contract.