YOUR EMINENT DOMAIN ATTORNEYS
IT IS OUR PLEDGE THAT WE WILL PROVIDE A FREE CASE REVIEW FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL OR BUSINESS FACING EMINENT DOMAIN OR CONDEMNATION.
IT IS STILL OUR PLEDGE THAT WE WILL PROVIDE A FREE CASE REVIEW FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL OR BUSINESS FACING EMINENT DOMAIN OR CONDEMNATION.
HIRING AN ATTORNEY? WATCH OUR VIDEO

Iowa board says Dakota Access pipeline ruling coming this winter

 

AR-150609687

DES MOINES — A state board plans to rule on a proposed crude oil pipeline in December or January, roughly a month after holding a public hearing, state documents show.

The Iowa Utilities Board this week published a timeline for ruling on the proposed $3.8 billion, 1,134-mile Dakota Access Pipeline.

According to Monday’s filing, the board has set aside more than three weeks, from Nov. 12 to Dec. 5, for a public hearing on the project.That puts the board on schedule to make a final decision “in late December of 2015 or early January of 2016,” according to the filing.

Full story here.

If you think you may be affected by the Dakota Access Project and/or are interested in a free consultation, contact our eminent domain landowner attorneys at 1-888-318-3761 or visit us on the web at www.landownerattorneys.com.

Photo: Retrieved From: https://www.thegazette.com/subject/news/iowa-board-says-dakota-access-pipeline-ruling-coming-this-winter-20150609

COMMERCIAL PROPERTY

What are the unique issues that face commercial property owners in condemnation that can make all the difference?

LEARN MORE

POWERLINES & PIPELINES

Landowners forget this one thing when dealing with utility companies that want an easement across their land.

LEARN MORE

ROAD & REDEVELOPMENT TAKINGS

What you need to know to be treated fairly by the condemning authority.

LEARN MORE

CONTACT US

Before going alone against the State let us give you our opinion. It is our pledge that we will provide a free case review for any individual or business facing eminent domain or condemnation. Contact us now at 888-318-3761

    * DIsclaimer: Form submission doesn’t constitute a client-attorney relationship/contract.
    X