YOUR EMINENT DOMAIN ATTORNEYS
IT IS OUR PLEDGE THAT WE WILL PROVIDE A FREE CASE REVIEW FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL OR BUSINESS FACING EMINENT DOMAIN OR CONDEMNATION.
IT IS STILL OUR PLEDGE THAT WE WILL PROVIDE A FREE CASE REVIEW FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL OR BUSINESS FACING EMINENT DOMAIN OR CONDEMNATION.
HIRING AN ATTORNEY? WATCH OUR VIDEO

EDITORIAL: Follow the Money on Illiana

Story originally published here.

On Oct. 17, the Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy Committee, which makes decisions regarding regional devleopment projects in norheast Illinois, approved adding the Illiana Expressway to its list of projects eligible for federal funding.

That vote overrode an advisory vote of the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning board, which opposes the Illiana based on a staff report that says the financial projections the state of Illinois has made, and the economic impact it has predicted, are wrong.

The difference between the two bodies (beyond the obvious difference that the MPO has actual power) is in their make-up. The CMAP board is more heavily weighted toward the city and Cook County; the MPO Policy Committee includes more suburban representatives, and a number of members from state agencies.

There was very much an “our turn” attitude to it, in the southern suburbs. One Cook County mayor called the Illiana a “highway to nowhere land,” “drawing jeers from Will County officials,” the Post-Tribune reported. On the one hand, there’s the sense that the developed area — the “somwhere” — should be taken care of and undeveloped land should stay that way. On the other hand, there’s the idea that more sparsly populated areas need infrastructure development to keep growing, and there’s no middle ground between growth and decline.

It seems that some of the larger transportation issues, mainly traffic relief on other expressways, including the Borman, has largely become a side issue, at least in Illinois.

And the clincher for state officials may be a relatively short-term issue: It will take a lot of people a long time to build a highway between Interstates 55 and 65. At the end of the day it’s very difficult for politicians to say “no” to that.

At the end of the day, studies analyzing finances and vehicle flows are easily steam-rolled by political interests. After the CMAP board voted not to support the Illiana, Bolingbrook Mayor Roger C. Claar said he wasn’t surprised. “They want their money spent in Chicago,” Claar said. “I understand that. It’s about money.”

The same dynamic played out, but with the opposite outcome, when the MPO committee made its decision.

If you think you may be affected by the Illiana Expressway and/or are interested in a free consultation, contact our eminent domain landowner attorneys at 1-888-318-3761 or visit us on the web at www.landownerattorneys.com.

COMMERCIAL PROPERTY

What are the unique issues that face commercial property owners in condemnation that can make all the difference?

LEARN MORE

POWERLINES & PIPELINES

Landowners forget this one thing when dealing with utility companies that want an easement across their land.

LEARN MORE

ROAD & REDEVELOPMENT TAKINGS

What you need to know to be treated fairly by the condemning authority.

LEARN MORE

CONTACT US

Before going alone against the State let us give you our opinion. It is our pledge that we will provide a free case review for any individual or business facing eminent domain or condemnation. Contact us now at 888-318-3761

* DIsclaimer: Form submission doesn’t constitute a client-attorney relationship/contract.
X