888.318.3761

YOUR EMINENT DOMAIN ATTORNEYS

IT IS OUR PLEDGE THAT WE WILL PROVIDE A FREE CASE REVIEW FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL OR BUSINESS FACING EMINENT DOMAIN OR CONDEMNATION.
IT IS STILL OUR PLEDGE THAT WE WILL PROVIDE A FREE CASE REVIEW FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL OR BUSINESS FACING EMINENT DOMAIN OR CONDEMNATION.
HIRING AN ATTORNEY? WATCH OUR VIDEO

A Look Back at Kentucky’s Pro-Landowner Pipeline Decision

Most eminent domain cases involve a dispute of the value of the land and how much the landowner should be compensated for giving up their property. In many cases, the eminent domain is legally justified and challenging the condemnation action altogether is a serious task. However, it is possible to do and landowners should assert their ownership rights if the taking is not justified under the law.

With the Dakota Access Pipeline back in the news as the project gets back underway, we thought we would take a look at a case in which landowners in Kentucky successfully fought against eminent domain actions due to a pipeline.

Landowners Were Concerned About the Bluegrass Pipeline

A few years ago, plans were announced for the Bluegrass Pipeline to carry natural gas liquids through 13 different counties in Kentucky. Many different landowners would be affected by the pipeline and the two energy companies behind the project were trying to use eminent domain power to run the pipeline through numerous private properties.

Landowners were worried about having such a pipeline on their properties and farms because the liquids would be flammable and could create serious safety and environmental concerns. In addition, unlike many other natural gas pipelines, this particular pipeline would not be serving residents in Kentucky, but private customers of the energy companies.

The Kentucky Court of Appeals first decided in favor of the landowners, ruling that this type of pipeline was not considered to be for “public use” because it was not a utility that was under Public Service Commission regulation. In 2016, the Kentucky Supreme Court declined review of the case, which means the Court of Appeals decision held. The decision is seen as a precedent that any utility not regulated by the PSC would not have the power to use eminent domain powers in Kentucky.

Contact a Kentucky Eminent Domain Lawyer for Assistance Today

The above case is an example of landowners who successfully asserted their rights with the help of eminent domain attorneys. At Sever Storey, LLP, we help landowners throughout Kentucky and other states protect their rights in condemnation actions. Please call today at 888.318.3761 if you need assistance.

1http://www.kentucky.com/news/state/kentucky/article44601102.html

2http://www.kentucky.com/news/politics-government/article59853106.html

COMMERCIAL PROPERTY

What are the unique issues that face commercial property owners in condemnation that can make all the difference?

LEARN MORE

POWER & PIPELINES

Landowners forget this one thing when dealing with utility companies that want an easement across their land.

LEARN MORE

ROAD & REDEVELOPMENT TAKINGS

What you need to know to be treated fairly by the condemning authority.

LEARN MORE

CONTACT US

Before going alone against the State let us give you our opinion. It is our pledge that we will provide a free case review for any individual or business facing eminent domain or condemnation. Contact us now at 888-318-3761

* DIsclaimer: Form submission doesn’t constitute a client-attorney relationship/contract.
X